I've been away from keeping up my site jesterjournal.com as much recently, and completely for the past couple weeks. The former because life events have taken over now; the latter because my computer melted down, and it's in the shop right now (so there hasn't been an updated October calendar posted, or new reviews recently).
Wish I could actually put this on the site itself for explanation, but that may take a few more days at least. I wanted to get it out there somewhere.
Anyway, once the technical problems are sorted out, it still will be running on a reduced basis because of these other focuses happening now. But I hope you'll still check it out and refer back to it from time to time.
Sunday, October 6, 2013
Friday, June 14, 2013
The Big Sitcom Theory
A lot of my family and friends are fans of "The Big Bang Theory" but I really have never favored many of the CBS sitcoms, especially the rat-a-tat, joke-joke-joke Chuck Lorre style ones.
This is a few weeks old now, but I did catch Bob Newhart's guest starring spot on the aforementioned show, and the respected comedy icon had a nice way of slowing down the pace with his performance, holding everything a beat or two longer than normal for the show, and thus making the episode funnier than it might otherwise have been.
Newhart's performance reinforced my point -- a sitcom needs something more than just hammering away with jokes to really be interesting. He injected something else into the proceedings, even on a multi-camera, largely studio-bound show.
This is a few weeks old now, but I did catch Bob Newhart's guest starring spot on the aforementioned show, and the respected comedy icon had a nice way of slowing down the pace with his performance, holding everything a beat or two longer than normal for the show, and thus making the episode funnier than it might otherwise have been.
Newhart's performance reinforced my point -- a sitcom needs something more than just hammering away with jokes to really be interesting. He injected something else into the proceedings, even on a multi-camera, largely studio-bound show.
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Killing Spree
What
I put out there with Jester is an intense interest in comedy performance, but I’m
just as equally into well-told dramatic TV and film, and have been for an
equally long time – I just don’t write about it very often.
Anyway,
I’ve gotten inspired to do so again by catching up to episodes of the AMC
series “The Killing
,” which returns next month for its third season. I’m
currently on the first few episodes of season 2 and thankfully have managed to
avoid any major spoilers. (Please don’t tell me any!) I had heard people were
disappointed and felt let down that season 1 did not conclude with a resolution
of the murder case at the center of the story, but when you marathon-watch the
episodes, that doesn’t matter so much.
From
the start of watching The Killing, I was immediately reminded of one of my
favorites, the 1990s NBC series “Homicide
,” whose creators Tom Fontana and
David Simon went on to do the HBO series “Oz,” “The Corner,” “The Wire” and “Treme”
(the latter three being all Simon’s), among other works. Despite the mastery of
those shows, The Killing, in tone and subject matter, could be called the true
successor to Homicide.
It
starts with something as small as the credits’ theme music -- airy flutes over
percussion that sounds like wood striking wood – and the visuals of abstract
close-up colors depicting sirens, rain, a murdered body and other images. The
tone of this introduction then bleeds into the action and the story itself. The
Killing’s central detectives, Linder (Mireille Enos) and Holden (Joel Kinnaman),
parallel Homicide’s Pembleton (Andre Braugher) and Bayliss (Kyle Secor). Linder
and Pembleton are the intense, focused ones and Holden and Bayliss are more
casual and sometimes screwed-up.
A
large portion of Homicide’s first season also focused on the murder of a young
girl, with Pembleton and Bayliss chasing several red herrings and dead ends.
Some of the criticism of The Killing – admittedly I had to skim it to avoid
spoilers – sprung from fan frustration at the way one possible suspect after
another was eliminated as a possibility, leaving our protagonists Linder and
Holden no closer to catching the killer. In the current television and pop
culture universe, audiences have less patience for this type of storytelling
than they might have when Homicide aired – hence the online chatter.
Just
as Homicide did, The Killing points out that real life doesn’t usually offer
the decisive resolutions that the Law & Order franchise, for all its
dramatic excellence, still does. With that, The Killing yields great
characterizations even in small parts. The detectives’ interrogation of Belko
Royce (Brendan Sexton III) and that character’s twisted relationship with his
mother recalls a scene in Homicide’s first season about Calpurnia Jones, who kills
off husbands and family members for insurance money. The detectives are
interviewing her very dim nephew, who reveals, “My wife, Aunt Calpurnia…” You
can just imagine the rest.
Aside
from this dark comic example, larger aspects of both shows have parallels –
highlighting depressed American cities outside the media capitals of NY, LA, SF
and DC as their settings – Seattle and Baltimore respectively. The police brass
in both shows are mired in department politics and bureaucratic pressures. And
when there’s real danger, you really feel it, as when Pembleton is threatened in
“The Gas Man
” episode and when Linder makes a discovery about mayoral candidate
Richmond toward the end of the first season, while at his apartment to speak
with him.
With
so many parallels, the creator of The Killing, Veena Sud, has got to be a fan
of Homicide. Sud previously did extensive writing and editing work on the late,
lamented CBS show Cold Case, and undoubtedly is steeped in crime fiction
television as a viewer as well.
Even
if The Killing doesn’t go beyond a third season – which is still a possibility
if the twists and turns don’t continue to stay true to this crime fiction TV
standard, it’s already made a mark as a classic piece of work, and an inheritor
of the Homicide mantle.
Monday, March 18, 2013
Adam Carolla - Dennis Prager evening
While on vacation in Southern California this past week, saw a performance of Adam Carolla and Dennis Prager's touring conversation show at Cal State Northridge on March 16. As a frequent listener to Carolla's podcast, but less familiar with Prager, a conservative syndicated radio talk show host, it appeared to me that Prager, who may be more well-thought out on his own air, lost some of his logic in trying to keep up banter and witticisms back and forth with Carolla.
At one point, remarking on political correctness, Prager said we are choosing between fighting evil and fighting carbon emissions, which is really a false choice. Just because we ought to fight evil, it doesn't mean we shouldn't also be concerned about global warming, or can't be. Prager also pulled up another example of what he believes is liberalism gone too far -- President Obama's admittedly misstated remark, "you didn't build that," made while attempting to explain the benefits government can provide, like an interstate highway system. But again, Prager couched his criticism using a false choice, saying that the same roads liberals want to claim credit for as infrastructure that supports commerce -- are also the same roads rapists use. Well, sure, but society would never build anything if it went by the possibility that it could conceivably make crimes possible on a very tangential basis.
In contrast, Carolla is experienced at making what could be considered political points and doing so humorously, which showed on this evening. Further elaborating on those who allege that there is "white privilege" in society that ought to be compensated, he tells a story of applying to be a firefighter in L.A. when he was 19, and not getting called to take the test for nine years. Carolla decided to go take the test anyway at that point, and of course found minority applicants in line to take the test who had only just applied that week. Skillfully told, as you might agree.
Carolla may enjoy working with Prager and the banter they have, but I expected a bit more after having enjoyed a previously recorded version of this show that the duo did last year, in which they seemed to draw the humor more organically out of their conversation. On this night, Prager sounded more unglued, possibly out of an effort to try and keep up with Carolla's wit, or to be as entertaining or funny, when that isn't really his forte.
At one point, remarking on political correctness, Prager said we are choosing between fighting evil and fighting carbon emissions, which is really a false choice. Just because we ought to fight evil, it doesn't mean we shouldn't also be concerned about global warming, or can't be. Prager also pulled up another example of what he believes is liberalism gone too far -- President Obama's admittedly misstated remark, "you didn't build that," made while attempting to explain the benefits government can provide, like an interstate highway system. But again, Prager couched his criticism using a false choice, saying that the same roads liberals want to claim credit for as infrastructure that supports commerce -- are also the same roads rapists use. Well, sure, but society would never build anything if it went by the possibility that it could conceivably make crimes possible on a very tangential basis.
In contrast, Carolla is experienced at making what could be considered political points and doing so humorously, which showed on this evening. Further elaborating on those who allege that there is "white privilege" in society that ought to be compensated, he tells a story of applying to be a firefighter in L.A. when he was 19, and not getting called to take the test for nine years. Carolla decided to go take the test anyway at that point, and of course found minority applicants in line to take the test who had only just applied that week. Skillfully told, as you might agree.
Carolla may enjoy working with Prager and the banter they have, but I expected a bit more after having enjoyed a previously recorded version of this show that the duo did last year, in which they seemed to draw the humor more organically out of their conversation. On this night, Prager sounded more unglued, possibly out of an effort to try and keep up with Carolla's wit, or to be as entertaining or funny, when that isn't really his forte.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
The Heisenberg - Disney experiment
I recalled that when I went to the Googa Mooga fest in Brooklyn's Prospect Park last May, and wore my Heisenberg t-shirt referencing Breaking Bad, I probably got about 3 or 4 compliments or comments recognizing the show.
Here in Southern California for vacation, on the inevitable Disneyland day, I decided to break out the Heisenberg shirt again.
Granted, there may be a lot more people that I encountered, at a much faster rate, and over a longer time, but I still got more nods for Heisenberg there than in the heart of hipster Brooklyn ... 7 overall. Perhaps Disney patrons are hipper than anyone might have guessed.
Here in Southern California for vacation, on the inevitable Disneyland day, I decided to break out the Heisenberg shirt again.
Granted, there may be a lot more people that I encountered, at a much faster rate, and over a longer time, but I still got more nods for Heisenberg there than in the heart of hipster Brooklyn ... 7 overall. Perhaps Disney patrons are hipper than anyone might have guessed.
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Die Hard 5 ... as reviewed by my mom
This is just too good not to share:
"I wanted to see a shoot-em-up, destroy the neighborhood movie one time out of curiosity. I will say that in the scenes in the movie where acting ability was required, the actors did a fine job. They all showed ability to carry roles in other movies where more acting would have been required."
I have to say, I think this is the birth of a new movie genre, the "destroy-the-neighborhood" film, where only the barest hint of acting is required, no matter how fine a job the actors can do.
"I wanted to see a shoot-em-up, destroy the neighborhood movie one time out of curiosity. I will say that in the scenes in the movie where acting ability was required, the actors did a fine job. They all showed ability to carry roles in other movies where more acting would have been required."
I have to say, I think this is the birth of a new movie genre, the "destroy-the-neighborhood" film, where only the barest hint of acting is required, no matter how fine a job the actors can do.
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Cheap Laughs
This story about the UCB Theatre's practice of not paying performers is sparking controversy among comedic performers in New York. I wonder what everyone thinks and who's right. Please write me or feel free to comment on this post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
